The Hidden Costs of Servicing Fintechs in Developing Countries: Insights and Solutions

The financial industry is facing a complex challenge: balancing the desire to innovate and expand into developing markets with the necessity of stringent regulatory compliance. This balancing act is especially precarious for US-based banks servicing fintechs in countries listed on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list. Mercury Bank’s recent decision to close accounts of startups in 13 African countries highlights the immense costs and risks involved. 

This article delves into the reasons behind such decisions and how advanced regtech platforms can provide effective solutions.

Why US Banks like Mercury Can No Longer Serve Countries on FATF GreyList

1. The High Cost of Compliance

Servicing fintechs and businesses domiciled in developing countries, particularly those on the FATF grey list, entails navigating a labyrinth of compliance requirements. The FATF grey list identifies jurisdictions with deficiencies in their anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) regimes. For banks, this translates to heightened scrutiny and a significant increase in operational costs.

Transactions originating from grey-listed countries are often flagged for further investigation, requiring banks to employ expensive AML consultants. These consultants must meticulously review and investigate each flagged transaction, leading to substantial costs. Mercury Bank’s decision to close accounts in 13 African countries exemplifies this financial burden. The cost of compliance, driven by the need to investigate numerous flagged transactions, often outweighs the potential rewards of servicing these clients.

2. False Positives: A Persistent Challenge

A major issue in servicing grey-listed countries is the high rate of false positives. Due to gaps in reliable and trusted data about the nature of transactions and the entities involved, legitimate transactions are frequently flagged. This results in an overwhelming number of false positives that banks must investigate and report, further straining resources. The labour-intensive process of sifting through these false alarms adds to the operational overhead, making it economically unviable for many banks to continue servicing these regions.

Case Study: Mercury Bank

Mercury Bank’s recent move to cease operations with startups in several African countries is a direct response to these challenges. The risk-reward balance is heavily skewed; the costs associated with compliance and the potential penalties for non-compliance are too high relative to the revenue generated. This is not an isolated case. Other financial institutions face similar dilemmas, often opting to avoid markets that cannot pass automated compliance checks and will inevitably be flagged for manual review.

The Risk Involved in Serving Countries on FATF GreyList

The risks for US-based financial service providers are significant. For example, the case of Ping Express, where the CEO and COO were imprisoned for money laundering, underscores the severe consequences of inadequate compliance measures. This incident highlights the critical need for robust AML compliance solutions to mitigate such risks effectively.

Addressing the Challenges with Youverify

The challenges of high compliance costs and false positives can be effectively addressed with advanced regulatory technology (regtech) platforms like Youverify. Here’s how Youverify can help:

1. Enhanced Data Coverage: 

Youverify offers comprehensive and reliable data coverage, ensuring that transactions and entities are well understood. This reduces the likelihood of false positives and unnecessary investigations.

2. Streamlined Compliance: 

By automating many compliance processes, Youverify reduces the need for costly manual intervention. This not only cuts down on operational costs but also accelerates the compliance process.

3. Risk Management: 

Utilizing advanced analytics and machine learning, Youverify can better assess and manage risks, ensuring that only genuinely suspicious transactions are flagged for further investigation.

4. Cost Efficiency: 

With reduced false positives and streamlined compliance, Youverify helps banks lower their operational costs, making it feasible to service fintechs and businesses in developing countries.

The Need for Comprehensive AML Solutions

Financial service providers looking to offer dollar-based services to fintechs in grey-listed countries must adopt cost-effective and enterprise-grade AML compliance solutions. These solutions should encompass enhanced due diligence, not limited to risk classification and transaction monitoring, in addition to Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) processes.

Youverify’s platform excels in providing these comprehensive solutions, ensuring that compliance does not become a bottleneck for growth.

Conclusion

The decision by Mercury Bank to close accounts of startups in several African countries highlights the substantial costs and risks associated with servicing fintechs in developing regions. However, with advanced regtech solutions like Youverify, these challenges can be mitigated. 

By improving data coverage, streamlining compliance, and effectively managing risks, Youverify offers a viable path forward for banks navigating the complex landscape of international financial services.

As the financial industry continues to evolve, the ability to efficiently and effectively manage compliance will be crucial. Youverify stands at the forefront of this transformation, providing the tools and insights needed to turn compliance from a cost centre into a competitive advantage.

Join over 100 businesses across the globe to automate your compliance process and manage risk using advanced analytics and machine learning while reducing costs. Request for a FREE DEMO.