Compliance AlertIssue 25Week ending
This issue inENFR

OFAC hits the Prince Group's corporate network as the FATF calls for global action on scam compounds

Scam compounds dominated the week. On 5 November OFAC designated four individuals and 41 entities behind the Prince Group's business network, and the FATF published a landmark report on the money flows behind scam compounds. On 4 November OFAC designated a network that sold false flags to Iran's shadow fleet, and on 5 November Australia announced sanctions on the leaders of both sides of Sudan's war. In enforcement, Block disclosed a proposed three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the US Justice Department, with a net payment of about US$764 million, and FINRA fined Webull US$4.2 million after it approved accounts opened with landscape photos instead of ID. Canada tabled a bill to restrict large cash deals and unlicensed crypto ATMs.

By Vyra from YouverifyPublished
7Stories
3Sanctions spotlight
2Enforcement actions
2Trends
What to do before Monday

Load this week's designations: Add OFAC's 4 and 5 November designations and Australia's five Sudan listings to screening, and confirm existing customers are re-screened automatically against them. Look past the customer to the corporate layer: For corporate customers in Cambodia, Hong Kong, the British Virgin Islands, Singapore, Mauritius and Malaysia, screen directors, company secretaries and shareholders, and apply the 50 per cent rule. Verify flags and registries, not only vessels: In trade finance and shipping payments, confirm flag and registry certificates through the flag state's official channels and screen registries and certification bodies. Test your identity verification vendor: Sample-test documents your vendor approved, confirm the check rejects images that are not identity documents, and review how manual reviewers handle unverifiable applications. Rehearse a 24 to 72 hour scam response: Document who can freeze, recall and share information on a suspected scam payment within hours, and test the routine with your main correspondent and peer institutions.

Sanctions spotlight

01
Sanctions spotlight · OFAC

OFAC targets the corporate network that kept the Prince Group's scam business running after earlier sanctions

On 5 November 2026 OFAC designated four individuals and 41 entities that it says support the business network of the Prince Group Transnational Criminal Organization, and a Malaysian national, Chui Kok Wa, who it says led a scam network in Madagascar. Forty-five of the designations were made under E.O. 13581, as amended, and one under E.O. 13694, as amended. Treasury says the Prince Group runs digital asset investment scams, romance scams and other online fraud from Southeast Asian scam compounds and launders the proceeds through shell and offshore companies, and that the new targets helped the network survive earlier sanctions by managing offshore structures, concealing beneficial ownership and evading prior designations. The four individuals are Qiu Yong, who controls companies in the British Virgin Islands and Hong Kong and whose SDN entry lists Cambodian, Turkish and Saint Lucian passports; his personal assistant Zhao Mengyao; He Yujing, wife of the previously designated Prince Group executive Chen Bo; and Visal Pang, a Cambodian associate already designated by the UK. Most of the 41 entities are companies linked to them or to earlier designees such as Dai An and Thet Li, in jurisdictions including Cambodia, Hong Kong, the British Virgin Islands, Singapore, Mauritius and Malaysia. Treasury says Chui's network defrauded Americans of more than US$400,000. The action builds on OFAC's Prince Group designations of 14 October 2025 and 23 June 2026.

Key takeaway

This action is aimed at the corporate layer, not the compounds: secretaries, nominee directors and holding companies that kept money moving after the first designations. Screen directors, company secretaries and shareholders as well as customers, apply the 50 per cent rule to entities owned by the newly designated persons, and re-run ownership checks on corporate customers in the jurisdictions named.

Sources: U.S. Treasury press release SB0683 and OFAC Recent Actions, 5 November 2026

02
Sanctions spotlight · OFAC

OFAC designates a network that sold false flags to Iran's shadow fleet, and issues a false-flag alert

On 4 November 2026, under what Treasury calls Operation Economic Outcast, OFAC designated an India-based network that it says posed as national ship registries to give vessels carrying Iranian petroleum false flags. Suniel Kumar Sharma was designated under E.O. 13902 for operating in Iran's petroleum sector, together with his spouse Jaspreet Preeti Shahid; Eswatini Maritime Affairs and International Ship Registry Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-based company; Oceaniek Technologies India; Aryavart Ship Management and its directors Ashwani Kumar Dhiman and Ishwinder Singh; and six further India-based companies linked to Shahid. Treasury says the pair began in 2014 by impersonating Dominica's flagging authority, that Eswatini publicly disavowed the registry Sharma set up in 2023, and that the network bought web domains to pose as flagging, certification and classification bodies for jurisdictions that had not authorised them, including Aruba, Guyana, Mali, Mozambique, Malawi, Sint Maarten and Timor-Leste. Fugo Ground Services in Türkiye was designated for ground handling for sanctioned Iranian airlines. OFAC published an alert on the Iranian shadow fleet's reliance on false flags and, under its Iran conventional arms authority, designated Alisher Domullodzhanov and added that tag to two existing entries, including Vanguard Tactical Supply Limited of Abuja, Nigeria.

Key takeaway

A flag on a vessel record is a claim, not a fact. Trade finance, marine insurance and shipping payment teams should confirm the flag and registry certificates through the flag state's own official channels, treat a registry run from outside the flag state or a website-only registry as a red flag, and screen registries, managers and certification bodies as well as owners and vessels.

Sources: U.S. Treasury press release SB0681 and OFAC Recent Actions, 4 November 2026

03
Sanctions spotlight · DFAT

Australia imposes human rights sanctions on the leaders of both sides of Sudan's war

On 5 November 2026 Australia announced Magnitsky-style human rights sanctions and travel bans on four Sudanese individuals and targeted financial sanctions on one entity. They are Abdel Fattah Abdelrahman al-Burhan, Commander-in-Chief of the Sudanese Armed Forces; Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo Mousa, Commander of the Rapid Support Forces; Al-Tijani Al-Tahir Karshoum, described as de facto Governor of West Darfur; Hussein Barsham, an RSF field commander; and the Al-Baraa Bin Malik Brigade, a paramilitary group aligned with the Sudanese Armed Forces. The Australian consolidated list records them under references 9000 to 9004 with a control date of 4 November 2026. The Foreign Minister said the sanctions build on those already imposed by Australia on 13 individuals under the UN Security Council's Sudan framework, and a class-based humanitarian permit has been issued for Sudan. Al-Burhan, Dagalo and the Al-Baraa Bin Malik Brigade already appear on OFAC's SDN List, Dagalo under the spelling MOUSA, Mohammed Hamdan Daglo.

Key takeaway

The same person can sit on several lists under different spellings: Dagalo Mousa in Canberra, Mousa Daglo in Washington. Screening needs transliteration-aware matching and alias coverage, and a match on one list should prompt a check of the others. Humanitarian payments into Sudan should be routed under the relevant permit and documented.

Sources: Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs media release, 5 November 2026, and the DFAT Consolidated List

Enforcement actions

04
Enforcement actions · SEC

Block accrues US$764 million after agreeing in principle to a three-year DPA with the US Justice Department over AML failings

In its quarterly report filed with the SEC on 3 November 2026, Block, Inc., the owner of Cash App and Square, disclosed that in October it reached an agreement in principle with the US Department of Justice to resolve the DOJ's inquiry through a deferred prosecution agreement. The DOJ would defer for three years a charge that the company failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering programme in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, and would move to dismiss it with prejudice if Block meets its obligations. Block expects the agreement to set a gross monetary component of about US$964 million and a net payment of about US$764 million after credit for prior regulatory resolutions, and it has accrued US$764 million as of 30 September 2026. The resolution still needs a final agreement and court approval, and Block says the final terms could result in losses above the amount accrued. The DOJ and SEC inquiries followed a short seller report published in March 2023; the SEC staff closed its investigation in March 2026 without recommending enforcement action.

Key takeaway

For payment apps, a criminal-law resolution over an AML programme is now a realistic outcome, not a remote one. Programme design has to scale with customer growth: onboarding checks, monitoring thresholds and investigation capacity all need to be re-sized as volumes rise. The terms are not final, so the monitorship and remediation obligations are still to be seen.

Sources: Block, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 30 September 2026, Note 16, filed with the SEC on 3 November 2026

05
Enforcement actions · FINRA Letter

FINRA fines Webull US$4.2 million after it approved accounts opened with photos of landscapes instead of ID

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (No. 2021073404901) with an action date of 5 November 2026, FINRA censured Webull Financial LLC and fined it US$4.2 million. FINRA found that between January 2020 and September 2023 the broker-dealer, which was opening millions of accounts a year and had at least seven million customer accounts by autumn 2023, failed to develop and implement a reasonably designed anti-money laundering programme, including its customer identification programme and procedures to detect and report suspicious transactions. According to FINRA, the firm approved more than 120,000 accounts without forming a reasonable belief that it knew the customer's true identity; approved on an automated basis more than 50 customers who submitted photos of scenic landscapes instead of government-issued identification, because it relied on an identity verification vendor it did not reasonably supervise; and in some cases approved applications despite information in its systems indicating the customer was deceased. The fine also covers identity theft prevention failures and best execution failures. Webull consented to the findings without admitting or denying them, and agreed to retain an independent consultant.

Key takeaway

Outsourcing identity verification does not outsource the obligation. Supervise the vendor's outcomes, sample-test approved documents, make sure the check confirms the image is an identity document at all, and route inconsistent or unverifiable applications to trained reviewers with manageable caseloads.

Sources: FINRA Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent No. 2021073404901, Webull Financial LLC, action date 5 November 2026

Cite this issue

Vyra from Youverify. "OFAC hits the Prince Group's corporate network as the FATF calls for global action on scam compounds." Youverify Weekly Compliance Alert, issue 25, 6 November 2026. https://youverify.co/compliance-alert/2026-11-06. Accessed 6 November 2026.

How this issue was verified

Every story was checked against the primary source: the issuing authority's own release, list entry, notice or settlement document, or for Block the company's own SEC filing. Figures, names and dates are as published there. The Block resolution is an agreement in principle disclosed by the company and is not final; Bill S-8 is a bill, not law. Trade press and newsletters were used only as leads.