The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule has been making headlines in the financial industry lately and for good reason. As digital currencies continue to gain popularity and usage, there is a growing need for regulations that ensure the safety and security of transactions. 
 

The FATF Travel Rule, introduced in 2019, aims to combat money laundering and terrorist financing by requiring Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to share certain information about their customers and transactions. 
 

While the FATF Travel Rule has received mixed reactions from the cryptocurrency community, it represents an important step towards creating a more transparent and accountable financial system. 
 

In this post, we will explore the FATF Travel Rule in detail and understand its implications for VASPs and the wider industry. We will also explore the following: 

 

  • Pros and cons of the FATF Travel Rule 
  • The implementation of the FATF Travel Rule 
  • The comparison of the FATF & BSA Travel Rule, and 
  • The possible implications of the FATF Travel Rule for the future of digital currency.

 

What is the FATF?

 

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is a global organization or intergovernmental organization inaugurated in 1989 to focus on combating money laundering and terrorist financing. 
 

The FATF has 38 member countries and two regional organizations and is responsible for setting global Anti-money Laundering (AML) and Counter-terrorist Financing (CTF) standards. 
 

Recently, they introduced a new rule called the Travel Rule that aims to regulate virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and ensure that they comply with Anti-money Laundering (AML) and Counter-terrorist Financing (CTF) regulations.

 

What is the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule?
 

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule is a set of guidelines that aim to prevent terrorist financiers from moving money around to conduct terrorist activities. 
 

The FATF Travel Rule is a recent development in the world of Anti-money Laundering (AML) and Counter-terrorist Financing (CTF) compliance. The Rule is also known as The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendation 16.
 

It requires Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to collect and share certain information about their customers when transferring funds between themselves. This information includes the name, address, and account number of the sender and recipient. 
 

Essentially, it aims to create a paper trail of transactions so that law enforcement agencies can better track down criminals who use virtual currencies to launder money or fund terrorist activities. 

 

Who is Covered by the FATF Travel Rule?

 

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule covers Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), for instance, financial institutions that engage in virtual asset transfers, and crypto institutions. The Travel Rule also covers, the institutions that provide the following services:

 

  • Virtual assets and fiat currency exchange services 
  • Transferring virtual assets
  • E-wallet services
  • Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) financial services 
  • Traditional wire transfer services
  • Providing insurance services 
  • Providing sale of virtual assets

 

Implementation of the FATF Travel Rule 

 

The implementation of the FATF Travel Rule has been somewhat of a challenge for VASPs because it requires them to comply with different regulations across multiple jurisdictions and also comply with strict data privacy and security standards. 

 

VASPs need to inaugurate a suitable system to collect and share customers' information to be able to comply with the FATF Travel Rule. This VASPs system responsibility needs to include: 

 

  • Gathering and verifying customer information, 
  • Maintaining up-to-date records of transactions
     

To balance the need for privacy with the need for FATF Travel Rule compliance, VASPs need to enforce secure data transmission protocols. The encryption and decryption (secure data transmission protocols) procedures will ensure that discreet information is safeguarded during transmission. 
 

To address these challenges of lack of standardized technology that can be used to transmit the required data securely, FATF has developed guidance that outlines how VASPs should comply with the Travel Rule. They have also provided a timeline for implementation, which began in June 2019. 

 

Furthermore, the VASPs must also have procedures in place to detect and notify for suspicious transactions that are liable to imply money laundering or terrorist financing. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) proposes that a minimum virtual asset transfer limit of 1,000 USD/EUR should be implemented by countries. 
 

VASPs are required to compile the names of the originator and beneficiary, including their virtual asset wallet addresses or their unique transaction reference numbers when the transfer is under 1,000 USD/EUR. When the transfer is above 1,000 USD/EUR, VASPs must compile additional information including: 

 

  • Originator's account number 
  • Originator's physical address 
  • Originator's National Identification Number (NIN)
  • Originator's Customer Identification Number (CIN)
  • Originator's date and place of birth 
  • Beneficiary's account number

 

What are the Pros and Cons of the FATF Travel Rule?

 

Let’s take a look at some of the pros and cons of the FATF travel rule:

 

Pros of FATF Travel Rule

 

  1. The FATF Travel Rule aims to protect the financial stability of the countries in which travellers reside.
  2. It provides transparency and enables virtual asset transactions to be traceable. 
  3. It encourages investors to invest by promoting more regulated and legitimate virtual asset demand.
  4. FATF Travel Rule better equipped financial institutions, including banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other VASPs to identify and monitor suspicious activity. 
  5. It helps to build trust and foster better collaboration and communication along the VASPs.

 

Cons of FATF Travel Rule 

 

  1. The rule can be difficult to implement.
  2. Banks can be reluctant to apply the rule, fearing that it may increase their compliance costs.
  3. The enactment of the FATF Travel Rule poses a substantial challenge for the crypto industry, due to its initial arrangement for anonymous transactions.
  4. It poses a challenge for some VASPs to comply with the FATF Travel Rule because it requires costly investment.
  5. The compliance burden may hinder the growth of the VASPs.
  6. The Travel Rule raises concerns due to sharing of personal information between VASPs.

 

What is the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Travel Rule?

 

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Travel Rule is a set of guidelines that apply to U.S. banks when they are processing financial transactions for clients who are travelling to or residing in high-risk countries.
 

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Travel Rule legislated by the United States of America (U.S.A.) Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in 1996, mandates financial institutions in the United States (U.S.) to share information (such as the name and address of the sender, the name and address of the recipient, and the amount of the transfer) when performing transactions of funds of three thousand dollars ($3,000) and above. 
 

The following financial institutions are subjected to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Travel Rule: 

 

  • Banks 
  • Credit Unions 
  • Money Service Businesses 
  • Casinos
     

FinCEN included transactions having to do with virtual currencies, (such as Ethereum and Bitcoin) to Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) Travel Rule in the year 2020 to fight money laundering and terrorist financing.
 

United States (U.S.) banks must use risk assessment tools to determine whether a client is a terrorist finance risk. They must also monitor and report any suspicious activity to law enforcement agencies and the Federal Reserve Bank.

 

Comparison of the FATF & BSA Travel Rule

 

The FATF Travel Rule and the BSA Travel Rule both focus on fighting money laundering and terrorist financing. They both also mandate financial institutions to collect and share the name, address, and account number of the sender and the recipient on transactions.
 

The two rules have some similarities, however, here are some of the differences:
 

  1. The FATF Travel Rule pertains to transactions in virtual assets by VASPs, while the BSA Travel Rule pertained to transactions of $3,000 and above in fiat currency by financial institutions.
  2. The FATF Travel Rule is a global criterion that involves countries and VASPs, while the BSA Travel Rule is a United States regulation carried out by the FinCEN.
  3. The FATF Travel Rule is less comprehensive than the BSA. The BSA applies to all financial transactions that involve a high-risk country, while the FATF Travel Rule only applies to those involving travel.
  4. The FATF Travel Rule has been criticized for being difficult to implement. The BSA is less criticized, although some banks may be reluctant to use it for fear of increased compliance costs.
  5. The FATF Travel Rule is more likely to lead to innocent people being identified as terrorist financiers. The BSA is less likely to lead to innocent people being identified as terrorist financiers.

 

Travel Rule Impact on the Virtual Asset Industry

 

The Travel Rule has significant implications for the virtual asset industry. While it may increase transparency and reduce criminal activities such as money laundering, it also requires VASPs to invest in technology and infrastructure to comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing  (CTF) regulations.

 

a. Future of Virtual Asset Regulation

 

The introduction of the Travel Rule by FATF signals a shift towards increased regulation of virtual assets around the world. As the virtual asset industry continues to grow, regulation must keep up with the evolving landscape to ensure that it remains transparent, secure, and compliant with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorism Financing  (CTF) regulations.
 

The FATF's Travel Rule is a significant step towards achieving this goal, but there is still much work to be done to ensure that virtual asset providers operate within a safe and regulated environment.  
 

To comply with the Travel Rule, VASPs are required to invest in technology and infrastructure that allows them to share customer information securely and efficiently with other VASPs. This could mean implementing new systems and processes that allow for the secure transmission of data between different VASPs, as well as ensuring that their internal systems are up to date and are able to handle increased compliance requirements.
 

The costs associated with these investments can be significant, particularly for smaller VASPs who may struggle to keep up with the pace of regulatory change. However, failure to comply with the Travel Rule could result in severe penalties, including fines or even suspension of operations.

 

b. Education and Support for Customers

 

VASPs will also need to ensure that their customers are aware of these new requirements. They will need to provide them with tools and resources to help manage their compliance obligations when using virtual assets. 
 

This could include providing information on how to securely store and transmit personal data, as well as providing access to compliance tools and resources. Educating customers on these requirements is crucial for ensuring compliance across the virtual asset industry. 
 

By empowering customers to take an active role in managing their compliance obligations, VASPs can reduce their risk exposure and help prevent criminal activities such as money laundering.

 

c. Standardised Global Regulation

 

The introduction of the Travel Rule by FATF is part of a larger trend towards increased regulation of virtual assets around the world. As more countries adopt similar rules and regulations, we may see a standardized approach to regulating virtual assets on a global scale. This type of coordination would be beneficial for both virtual asset providers and consumers alike. 


A standardized approach would create greater transparency in the market, making it easier for consumers to understand the risks associated with different virtual assets. 
 

Additionally, it would make it easier for virtual asset providers to comply with regulations across different jurisdictions without having to develop bespoke compliance solutions for each market.

 

Bottom Line

 

The FATF's Travel Rule is a significant step towards achieving greater transparency and reducing criminal activities in the virtual asset industry. 
 

However, complying with this regulation comes with significant costs and challenges for virtual asset providers. VASPs will need to invest in technology and infrastructure, as well as educate their customers on compliance requirements.
 

The global trend towards increased regulation of virtual assets is likely to continue, and we may see a standardized approach emerge over time. 
 

As the industry continues to evolve, regulations must keep up with these changes to ensure that customers are protected, and the industry remains transparent and compliant with AML/CTF regulations.

 

See how 100+ leading companies use Youverify for KYC and AML screening of customers for compliance and real-time risk detection. Request a demo today.